Barrier to the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices by small-scale farmers in Kebbi state, Nigeria – CIAS Journal – CIAS Journal
Research Article
Volume 2 | Issue 2 (Apr - June) |Article ID CIAS0044 | doi.org/cias/3rsr2sds

Barrier to the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices by small-scale farmers in Kebbi state, Nigeria


Aliyu Danmaigoro iD1, Zayyanu Usman Doma2, Usman Baba3, Audu Sanusi4

Show more
Academic Editor: Dr. Shrinivas C S
Recieved
03 Oct 2024
Revised
12 Mar 2025
Accepted
16 Mar 2025
Published
01 Apr 2025

Abstract

The study examined the barriers smallholder farmers in Nigeria's Kebbi State faced while attempting to implement climate-smart farming methods. To choose 120 respondents for the study, a three-stage sampling technique was employed. A well-structured questionnaire schedule was used to collect the data, and frequency and percentage were used for analysis. Access to farmer-based insurance was cited by nearly half of the respondents (31.3%) as a very high economic barrier. Infertile soil (58.0%) and the prevalence of weeds, pests, and diseases (67.3%) were cited by a significant portion of respondents as major environmental limitations. Disputes between farmers and herders (62.0%) and tribal disputes (51.3%) were examples of socio-cultural restrictions. Institutional restrictions included limited access to extension services (57.3%) and minimal government assistance for agricultural inputs (53.3%). Therefore, it is advised that budgetary support be provided and public-private partnerships be strengthened to leverage funding for the implementation of climate-smart activities. 


Introduction

There are factors affecting the development and sustainability of agriculture which include social, economic and environmental factors (Toliatkashani et al., 2019). Climate is an environmental component that has a significant impact on agriculture; it impacts the sorts of crops that can be cultivated as well as the length of each crop's growth season. Unfortunately, the world's climate is currently changing, hurting agriculture in a variety of ways. These include variations in average temperatures, rainfall, other climate extremes, insect and disease infestation, changes in atmospheric carbon, ground-level ozone concentration, and changes in the nutritional value of some crops (Abdulrahman et al., 2021).

These changes have a greater impact on smallholder farmers and developing nations. To ensure food security in the face of climate change, a systematic approach to sustainable agricultural growth must be developed that does not deplete the soil's natural state (Ukhurebor et al., 2021). Climate-smart agriculture methods are one example of such an intervention. It is a novel method of guiding the necessary adjustments to agricultural systems, especially to address the issues of food security and climate change, rather than a new agricultural system. A method for changing and refocusing agricultural development in light of the new realities of climate change is known as climate-smart agriculture (CSA) (Food and Agricultural Organization, 2022).

Climate change can affect all humans because of the severe threats it poses to the environment and agricultural harvests around the world. The climate influences the distribution and number of organisms. Enhancing carbon dioxide (CO2) accumulation has a wide range of possible consequences on plants, as well as indirect dangers to herbivores and other food chain members. Extreme weather conditions such as heavy rainstorms, high wind pressures, and high temperatures have a significant impact on agricultural activity. Climate and agriculture are inextricably linked universal processes, and hence climate variations affect agricultural activity. A large climate change risk is due to a temperature rise (global warming) which is predicted to pose major threats to the environment disturbing agriculture, with higher CO2 quantities, increase in atmospheric average temperature, large glacial overflow, varied rainfall sequence and the interrelation of all the above factors (Ekpa et al., 2021).

The severe and negative consequences on small-scale farmers' access, availability, and sufficiency of food were confirmed by Mburu et al. (2014) in their study on the effects of climate variability and change on food security. Nearly 80% of small-scale farmers who rely on agriculture for their livelihood will experience increased food insecurity, slower economic growth, and poverty as a result of the interplay of multiple factors, including temporal and spatial climate variability, seasonal pattern changes, degraded soil, and uncertain future climate scenarios (Ani et al., 2022). The general objective of the study was to ascertain constraints to the use of climate-smart agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Kebbi State, Nigeria. Specifically, the research

  1. Assessed farmers’ level of awareness of climate-smart agricultural practices 
  2. Examined the constraints to the use of climate-smart agriculture practices among small-scale farmers


Material and Methods

The study was carried out in Kebbi State, Nigeria. The State lies in the northwest Sudan Savannah region between latitudes 10° 051 and 13° 271N of the equator and between longitudes 3° 351 and 6° 031E of the Greenwich. The State has a population of 3,351,831 (NPC, 2006) according to the 2006 census. Projecting this population to the year 2022 at 3% growth rate reveals the population as 4,351,067. Over two-thirds of the population is engaged in agricultural production, mainly arable crops alongside cash crops with livestock production.The population of this study comprised selected small-scale farmers in Kebbi State.  

A randomized selection was used to select 120 small-scale farmers from three local governments in the state.  One local government area was randomly selected from each of the three senatorial districts of Kebbi State. These include Argungu, Bunza and Zuru Local Government Areas from Kebbi North, Central and South respectively. Two rural communities were selected from each of the local government areas and small-scale farmers were selected from each community randomly. A well-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from the small-scale farmers. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the socioeconomic characteristics of respondents.


Results and Discussion

Awareness of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices

Table 1 highlights the awareness levels of various climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices among farmers. The highest awareness percentage (75.3%) is observed for agroforestry and fodder trees. Agroforestry integrates trees into farming systems providing benefits like improved soil fertility, enhanced biodiversity, and sustainable livelihoods. High awareness in this area indicates the potential for significant environmental and economic impacts if properly implemented. Odebode (2021), confirms the growing recognition of agroforestry's role in mitigating climate change and improving farm productivity. Improved fodder production also shows substantial awareness (74.0%). This practice enhances livestock nutrition and reduces dependency on overgrazing, which often leads to land degradation. The emphasis on improved fodder production aligns with the increasing focus on sustainable livestock management (Abdullahi and Ibrahim, 2020).

Weather prediction has an awareness rate of (70.7%), reflecting farmers' reliance on accurate forecasts for planting and harvesting decisions. The importance of this practice is underlined by Ayanlade et al. (2022), who emphasize the role of localized weather prediction tools in enhancing resilience to climate variability in Nigeria.  Moderate awareness levels are seen in tree planting (64.0%) and climate change campaigns (60.7%), suggesting that these practices are gaining traction but require more targeted outreach programs. Soil water conservation and better livestock management, with awareness levels of (46.0%) and (27.3%), respectively, indicate gaps that need to be addressed. Eze et al. (2019) emphasize the importance of educating farmers on water conservation techniques and sustainable livestock practices to ensure CSA's broader adoption.


Table 1: Awareness of climate-smart agricultural practices  

Constraints to the Use of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices

Table 2 outlines the constraints to adopting CSA practices, with a focus on economic, environmental, socio-cultural, and institutional factors. The most significant constraint is the experience of weeds and pests, with a very high constraint percentage of (67.3%). This issue is a critical challenge in Nigerian agriculture, as noted by Okpala et al. (2023). The prevalence of weeds and pests reduces crop yields and raises production costs, discouraging the adoption of CSA practices.

Farmers/herders’ conflicts are another major barrier, with (62.0%) of respondents identifying them as a very high constraint. These conflicts often arise over land use, undermining agricultural productivity and rural stability. According to Adisa and Adekunle (2021) highlight the urgent need for conflict resolution mechanisms to address these recurring issues and facilitate sustainable farming. Infertile soil (58.0%) and limited access to extension services (57.3%) also rank high as constraints. Infertile soils hinder productivity making it challenging for farmers to adopt CSA practices that require healthy soil conditions. Meanwhile, limited access to extension services restricts farmers' knowledge and technical support, a gap frequently cited in Nigerian agricultural studies (Oladele et al., 2020).

Institutional constraints like inadequate government support with farm inputs (53.3%) and the land tenure system (50.7%) further complicate CSA adoption. Access to inputs such as fertilizers and seeds is critical for implementing CSA practices, but inefficiencies in distribution remain a persistent problem. Similarly, the land tenure system in Nigeria often limits farmers' ability to  make long-term investments in sustainable agricultural practices. Drought occurrence (55.3%) also poses significant challenges, as unpredictable rainfall patterns exacerbate water scarcity. This issue is particularly relevant in Nigeria's semi-arid regions, where climate change has intensified drought conditions, according to Ajibade et al. (2022).

Finally, socio-cultural constraints like community taboos (39.3%) and institutional challenges such as government policy on CSA (38.0%) highlight the need for awareness campaigns and policy reforms. Addressing these constraints will require collaboration between stakeholders, including government bodies, research institutions, and local communities.


Table 2: Constraints to the use of climate-smart agricultural practices

Conclusion

The analysis of awareness and constraints related to CSA practices underscores both opportunities and challenges in achieving sustainable agriculture in Nigeria. High awareness of practices like agroforestry and fodder production suggests a foundation for further development, while constraints such as weeds, pests, and institutional barriers highlight areas requiring urgent attention. To maximize the potential of CSA practices, policymakers and stakeholders should prioritize investment in extension services, conflict resolution, and policy support, as suggested by recent Nigerian studies.

The farmers’ level of knowledge contributes to the efficient and effective usage of climate-smart agriculture, and challenges encountered by the smallholder farmers affect the level of climate-smart agriculture usage. The concept of agriculture extension should be strengthened to promote easier and faster assimilation of CSA. The government should revisit the concept and prioritize their focus to facilitate general acceptance and easy adoption of CSA practices with their up-scaling at all levels including financial and intuitional support. The socio-cultural factors should be properly integrated into CSA blueprints. 


References

Abdullahi, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2020). Focus on sustainable livestock management in Nigerian agricultural research. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 18(2), 45–58.

View at:

Abdulrahman, O. L., Adebayo, A. R., & Olatunde, P. F. (2021). Climate change and insecurity in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 30th Annual National Congress of the Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, 122–125. https://rusan.org.ng/ proceedings/30th.pdf

View at: Publisher site

Adisa, S. R., & Adekunle, A. O. (2021). Farmers/herders’ conflicts and implications for sustainable farming in Nigeria. African Journal of Conflict Resolution, 12(3), 92–108.

View at:

Ajibade, O., Akintunde, M., & Olaniyan, J. (2022). Climate variability and drought conditions in Nigeria's semi-arid regions. Nigerian Journal of Climate Studies, 7(1), 25–40.

View at:

Ani, K. J., Anyika, V. O., & Mutambara, E. (2022). The impact of climate change on food and human security in Nigeria. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 14(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2020-0119

View at: Publisher site

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Views
118
Downloads
3
No related articles